In a stunning twist of irony, a New Mexico court has ordered Meta—yes, the same Meta that wants the world to adopt its age verification schemes—to pay a cool $375 million for, among other things, misleading the public about how safe its platforms are for children. Because nothing says “trust us” like a historic verdict that says you endangered kids and then lied about it.
The jury found that Meta, the proud parent of Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, didn’t just fail to protect children—it actively put them at risk by allowing sexual predators and explicit content to flourish, all while its algorithms cheerfully “recommended” this content to underage users.
According to New Mexico Attorney General Raul Torrez, this is the first time a state has successfully sued Meta over child safety. “Enough is enough,” he declared, echoing the sentiments of parents, educators, and anyone with a shred of common sense. Apparently, Meta’s internal research agreed—16% of Instagram users reported seeing unwanted nudity or sexual activity in a single week.
Meta, ever the martyr, insists it’s “disappointed” with the verdict and will appeal. A spokesperson said the company “works hard” to keep people safe and is “clear” about the challenges of identifying bad actors. Sure, Mark. We’re all aware of how tricky it is to stop predators when your business model depends on engagement, not ethics.
The trial, which lasted seven weeks, unearthed a treasure trove of internal documents and whistleblower testimony. Arturo Béjar, a former Meta engineering leader, shared how his own daughter was propositioned for sex on Instagram. But don’t worry—Meta’s “Teen Accounts” and new parental alert features are here to save the day! Because nothing fixes systemic exploitation like a few band-aids and a press release.
The $375 million penalty? That’s the result of thousands of violations, each worth up to $5,000. It’s a hefty sum, but let’s be real: for a company that’s busy trying to force age verification laws on the rest of the world, it’s pocket change. Especially when you consider Meta’s simultaneous legal battles over addiction claims and the thousands of similar lawsuits piling up in US courts.
So here’s the takeaway: Meta wants everyone to jump through hoops to prove they’re adults, all while it’s been caught red-handed endangering kids on its platforms. Maybe next time, instead of lobbying for laws that infringe on privacy, the company should focus on actually protecting the children it claims to care about. But hey, who needs integrity when you’ve got algorithms, right?
In the end, the jury’s message was clear: Meta’s “safety” talk is as believable as a politician’s promise. And while the company scrambles to appeal, the world watches—waiting to see if Meta will finally clean up its act(it won’t), or just double down on the spin.
Source: BBC
Like my content? Support me with a tip!
