ArXiv, one of the world’s leading repositories for scientific preprints, will impose a one-year ban on authors who submit articles clearly containing unreviewed text generated by artificial intelligence. After the ban, any new submissions from those authors will only be accepted if the paper has already been published or peer-reviewed by a reputable outlet.
Thomas Dietterich, president of ArXiv’s computer science section, explained on X (formerly Twitter) that the policy targets articles that reproduce AI “hallucinations” or simply leave in fragments of chatbot output. The platform will apply the penalty only when there is clear evidence that large language model (LLM) text has been published without human verification.
In an interview with 404 Media, Dietterich said the rule applies from the first offense. There will be an internal review process: a moderator must document the violation, and the section’s leadership must confirm it. Authors will have the right to appeal.
What is ArXiv?
ArXiv is a preprint server, meaning it hosts articles before formal peer review. This accelerates the dissemination of research across many fields, but it has also made the repository more vulnerable to automated content.
As 404 Media noted, last November ArXiv stopped accepting computer science submissions due to a surge in LLM-assisted papers. In January, it began requiring new authors to be endorsed by an established researcher before their first submission.
These moves follow reports from outlets like The Nikkei, which in late 2025 revealed that some scientists were embedding hidden prompts in their manuscripts to manipulate AI tools used by reviewers. A similar incident occurred recently in Brazil, where two lawyers were fined 84,000 reais for allegedly trying to influence an AI system used by labor courts through concealed commands in a legal filing.
The broader context
The issue extends beyond ArXiv. A Columbia University study cited by 404 Media analyzed 2.5 million biomedical articles over three years and found a significant rise in fabricated references—by 2025, one in 458 papers contained such issues.
To adapt, ArXiv—currently managed by Cornell University—is set to become an independent nonprofit in July. The change is expected to help fund the rising costs of moderation and the growing challenge of AI-generated submissions.
Source: Tecnoblog
